Stamp one
“Last medically reviewed”
The date our GP reviewer last checked this page for clinical accuracy.
Editorial policy
How we make our content
Health information is only worth anything if it's right. This page sets out exactly how we research, write, check and date everything you read on My Health Choice — including where AI helps and where a doctor takes over.
The process
Three steps, one named GP
No invented review board, no imaginary fact-checking department. This is the whole pipeline.
Drafted
We research from UK clinical sources and draft with AI assistance. Drafting is the start of the process, never the end of it.
Reviewed by a GP
Dr Ashish [Surname], a GMC-registered GP, reads, corrects and signs off every health page. Nothing clinical publishes without his review.
Dated and re-checked
We publish with a review date and come back to the page on a set cycle, or sooner if UK guidance changes.
Dates, defined
What the dates mean
Three different stamps appear on our pages. Each certifies a different thing.
Stamp two
“Updated on”
The date we last edited the page — a price, a link, a typo. An edit is not a medical review, so the two dates can differ.
Stamp three
“Next review due”
When we'll check the page again. If guidance changes before then, we don't wait.
Where our information comes from
We use UK consensus sources, in this order of preference:
- NHS — the starting point for condition and treatment information.
- NICE — for what UK clinical guidance actually says.
- MHRA — for licensing, classification and safety information.
- Cochrane and peer-reviewed UK clinical literature — where the first three don't settle a question.
We cite sources inline and list them at the foot of each health page. We don't use US health publishers as our basis — UK guidance is what applies to you.
Who reviews
One reviewer, named and checkable
Every health page carries a byline naming its author and its reviewer, kept visibly separate, with the dates above. The reviewer's name always links to his profile, where you can check his registration on the official GMC register yourself.
Ashish reviews our condition and education pages for clinical accuracy. He doesn't write the comparison data, set prices, or take part in commercial decisions — his profile page spells out that boundary in full.
About Dr Ashish [Surname] →
Methodology
How we review providers
When we assess a provider, we record facts about the service, never the medicine. We don't currently publish a score or rating of our own — a scoring rubric is planned, and it will be published on this page before any rating appears. Four kinds of fact go on the record.
- GPhC registration — is the pharmacy on the official register? Where we can verify the entry, we link it so you can check it too.
- Price transparency — is the full price shown upfront, with no hidden add-ons at checkout?
- What's included — whether the consultation, follow-up and delivery sit inside the published price.
- Independent reviews — what verified customers say, always attributed to the source.
We check these at our desks, against the registers and the providers' own published pages — we don't claim to have used each service as a patient. Anything we can't verify is left off the card, and payment from a provider never changes what we record.
Corrections, and our use of AI
AI helps us draft pages and keep them current. It never has the final word — a named GP does, on every health page, before it goes live. We'd rather tell you that plainly than let you wonder.
If you spot something wrong, email hello@myhealthchoice.co.uk. We'll check it, fix it, and re-date the page so the correction is visible rather than silent.